Comments on: Google Chrome http://blog.deensoft.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/ Deensoft blog Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:18:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: Obaid http://blog.deensoft.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/#comment-8402 Obaid Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:38:37 +0000 http://blog.deensoft.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/#comment-8402 ^ Thanks Franz. I will update the code tonight and publish it on the site. ^ Thanks Franz.

I will update the code tonight and publish it on the site.

]]> By: Franz http://blog.deensoft.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/#comment-8400 Franz Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:06:35 +0000 http://blog.deensoft.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/#comment-8400 @raid to et the reflection work at protoflow V1 use cahnge the webkit exception at the relfection.js if (navigator.appVersion.indexOf(’WebKit’) != -1 && navigator.appVersion.indexOf(’Chrome’) == -1) { context.fill(); } else { context.fillRect(0, 0, reflectionWidth, reflectionHeight*2); } somewhere around line 139 it's not a perfect patch because there are issues that at first the background of the reflection is white, but better then no reflection br franz http://www.facesaerch.com @raid

to et the reflection work at protoflow V1 use

cahnge the webkit exception at the relfection.js

if (navigator.appVersion.indexOf(’WebKit’) != -1 && navigator.appVersion.indexOf(’Chrome’) == -1) {
context.fill();
} else {
context.fillRect(0, 0, reflectionWidth, reflectionHeight*2);
}

somewhere around line 139

it’s not a perfect patch because there are issues that at first the background of the reflection is white, but better then no reflection

br
franz
http://www.facesaerch.com

]]> By: Franz http://blog.deensoft.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/#comment-8350 Franz Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:38:16 +0000 http://blog.deensoft.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/#comment-8350 did you realize that the refelction.js (like the fork used in protolfow) does not work with google chrome, do you allready have a fix for it? asks and br face search did you realize that the refelction.js (like the fork used in protolfow) does not work with google chrome, do you allready have a fix for it? asks and br face search

]]> By: Franz http://blog.deensoft.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/#comment-8210 Franz Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:22:06 +0000 http://blog.deensoft.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/#comment-8210 about the name: it's great, it's short - it has not much of a previous meaning and we will get used to it (remember how many people did not accept the firebird name, and when firefox was introduced they wanted firebird back....) ad 2) google tries a new paradigm with the browser: it's not any more about the browser - it's about the web, so i think it was a great choice to get rid of all the stuff (even so i made sure that ma beloved bookmarks toolbar is shown). about the name:
it’s great, it’s short - it has not much of a previous meaning and we will get used to it (remember how many people did not accept the firebird name, and when firefox was introduced they wanted firebird back….)

ad 2) google tries a new paradigm with the browser: it’s not any more about the browser - it’s about the web, so i think it was a great choice to get rid of all the stuff (even so i made sure that ma beloved bookmarks toolbar is shown).

]]> By: media kingdom http://blog.deensoft.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/#comment-8185 media kingdom Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:52:31 +0000 http://blog.deensoft.com/2008/09/03/google-chrome/#comment-8185 should be interesting to see if Chrome works more efficiently than FireFox... if it's faster than Firefox, since isn't IE, then i'll use it should be interesting to see if Chrome works more efficiently than FireFox… if it’s faster than Firefox, since isn’t IE, then i’ll use it

]]>